training.md

Training Tasks & Methods

← Back to the Soup README

SFT, DPO/GRPO/PPO/KTO/ORPO/SimPO/IPO/BCO, tool-calling, PRM, pre-training, distillation, classification, vision/audio/TTS, unlearning, RAFT/RA-DIT, and the loop-hardening detectors.

Training a model bigger than your GPU? training.stream_layers: true streams the frozen base from CPU RAM (with NVMe disk overflow) one decoder layer at a time, so peak VRAM is bounded by one layer instead of the whole model. Add quantization: 4bit and an 8B base fits a 4 GB card. Works for sft and, from v0.72.4, for dpo / orpo / simpo / kto — DPO's reference model is the same streamed base with its adapters switched off, so it costs no extra weights — see Layer Streaming.

Contents:

• Continual-learning rehearsal (--replay)
• Loop Hardening
• Unlearning (task='unlearn', NPO / SimNPO / RMU)
• Continued Pre-training
• Knowledge Distillation
• Sequence Classification
• Reasoning Effort + EOT Control
• EBFT / GDPO Loss Variants
• GRPO Objective Variants
• Process Reward Model (PRM)
• PRM-guided GRPO (process-supervised RL)
• Weighted Multi-Objective Preference Loss
• MoE Model Support
• Vision / Multimodal Fine-tuning
• Audio / Speech Fine-tuning
• GRPO Plus — Objective Variants, Long-Context RL, Multi-Turn Agents
• DPO Training
• Preference Variety — BCO + Unified Dispatcher + KL Variants
• GRPO Training (Reasoning)
• Tool-Calling Fine-Tuning
• PPO / Full RLHF Pipeline
• KTO Training (Unpaired Preferences)
• ORPO Training (No Reference Model)
• SimPO Training (Simple Preference)
• IPO Training (Regularized Preference)
• RAFT — Retrieval-Augmented Fine-Tuning
• RA-DIT — Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning
• Curriculum-Aware Training (BETA)
• TTS Fine-Tuning (BETA, v0.52.0)
• Classifier / Reranker / Cross-Encoder Training (BETA, v0.52.0)
• Knowledge Distillation (BETA, v0.52.0)
• EBFT + GDPO (BETA, v0.52.0)
• gpt-oss reasoning_effort + train_on_eot (v0.52.0)
• Seeds & reproducibility (training.seed)
• Full fine-tuning (lora.r: 0)

---

Seeds & reproducibility (training.seed)

Two knobs, both unset by default:

training:
  seed: 1234        # weight init of new params, data order, dropout
  data_seed: 99     # optional — data order ONLY, so init stays fixed

seed reaches TrainingArguments.seed (which Trainer.__init__ hands to transformers.set_seed, covering random, numpy and torch) and the multipack FFD sampler. data_seed reaches TrainingArguments.data_seed; set it alongside seed to vary only the order rows are seen in while holding initialisation fixed.

Why you want this. Without a seed knob every run of a config took the same default, so "run it again with a different seed" was impossible: replicates of one arm differed only by row permutation and GPU nondeterminism. That understates run-to-run spread, and spread is the yardstick a real between-arm difference has to beat. Three replicates at three seeds is the cheapest honest error bar you can put on a training change:

for s in 1 2 3; do
  soup train --config soup.yaml --output "runs/seed-$s" \
    && echo "seed $s done"   # set training.seed: $s in the config per run
done

"Unset" does not mean the same thing for both fields. An unset seed resolves to 42, HuggingFace's own TrainingArguments default. An unset data_seed stays None, which HF reads as "follow seed" rather than as a seed of its own, so leaving it out is not the same kind of default as leaving seed out. The multipack sampler still gets 0, the value it has had since v0.37.0. The fields are Optional[int] rather than defaulting to 42 precisely so the trainer can tell "unset" from "explicitly 42" and keep those different historical defaults intact.

What changes for a run that sets neither field. The values it trains at are the same as before: seed 42, data_seed at None. What is new is when the seed arrives. Before #353 nothing called set_seed ahead of get_peft_model, so lora_A and any freshly initialised classification head were drawn from torch's default generator, which is seeded from entropy once per process. An unseeded run's initialisation therefore varied from one process to the next, and it is now deterministic at 42. If you were getting replicate spread out of runs that set no seed, that is where it was coming from: those runs are identical to each other now, and varying a replicate means setting training.seed on purpose.

Bounds: [0, 2**32 - 1] (set_seed feeds numpy.random.seed, which rejects anything outside that range), 0 is a legitimate seed, and a YAML true is rejected rather than silently becoming seed 1. data_seed is forwarded to Accelerate's dataloader configuration and needs accelerate >= 1.1.0; below that, transformers warns and ignores it (seed is unaffected).

Scope. Every task wrapper threads both fields into the TrainingArguments subclass it builds, and applies seed before it loads the model, so the LoRA adapter and any freshly initialised head are drawn at the configured seed rather than at whatever the process happened to be sitting on (#353). unlearn builds no Trainer at all, and its RMU control vector follows training.seed too, staying at 0 when the seed is unset. The pretrain and layer-streaming paths pick seed up for their samplers as well.

Through v0.73.0 this reached the SFT trainer only, so training.seed: 7 on a DPO or GRPO run was accepted and silently trained at 42.

The one path that still ignores both fields is the MLX backend (backend: mlx), whose trainers seed nothing at all — MLX has its own RNG (mx.random). Setting either field there now prints a warning naming it (MLX backend ignores: training.seed ...) rather than accepting it in silence, so an MLX run cannot look seeded while it is not.

Not a determinism guarantee. A fixed seed makes the software RNG reproducible. It does not make CUDA kernels bit-reproducible — non-deterministic atomics, autotuned algorithms and a different GPU or library version can still move the last digits. For bit-exact reruns you also need torch.use_deterministic_algorithms(True), which Soup does not set for you.

Full fine-tuning (lora.r: 0)

Train every parameter, no adapter:

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M
task: sft
training:
  quantization: none    # full-FT trains float weights
  lora:
    r: 0                # <- no adapter; the base itself trains

lora.r: 0 is the supported spelling for plain full fine-tuning. It is the one soup's classifier trainer has read as "no adapter" since v0.71.12, and the one soup card already resolves to a dense model rather than an adapter — so the model card, the registry entry and the trainer all agree without extra flags. On a rank of 0 the SFT trainer skips get_peft_model entirely: soup train prints Full fine-tuning: N parameter tensor(s) trainable (lora.r=0, no adapter) instead of LoRA applied, and the output directory holds a complete model, not an adapter to merge.

Requirements, each rejected at config load with the reason named: task: sft, backend: transformers, modality: text, and quantization: none (quantized weights cannot be trained directly — use LoRA on top of them, i.e. QLoRA). It is mutually exclusive with every LoRA feature (use_dora / use_vera / use_olora / use_rslora / rank_pattern / alpha_pattern / init_strategy / moe_lora / use_longlora / relora_steps / loraplus_lr_ratio) — a LoRA knob next to r: 0 is a contradiction rather than something to silently ignore — and with the other two "LoRA off" modes, Spectrum (unfrozen_parameters) and LISA (lisa_enabled), since each independently decides what trains. It cannot be combined with layer streaming: streaming keeps the decoder on the meta device and trains only the adapter, so there would be nothing to full fine-tune.

freeze_layers / freeze_ratio do stay legal with r: 0 — "train everything above layer N" is a real technique — and the trainer respects whatever they froze instead of silently unfreezing it. If they leave nothing trainable the run is refused rather than burning GPU-hours on a no-op.

Pick between the three "LoRA off" modes by how much you want to train:

Spelling	Trains	Use when
lora.r: 0	everything	you have the VRAM and want the strongest baseline
unfrozen_parameters (Spectrum)	a hand-picked / SNR-ranked set	you want full-FT quality on the layers that matter
lisa_enabled (LISA)	a rotating random subset	you want full-FT quality at LoRA-like memory

Full fine-tuning needs far more memory than LoRA: optimizer state alone is ~8 bytes per parameter for AdamW. batch_size: "auto" estimates memory from a LoRA-shaped model, so on a full-FT run it errs optimistic — set batch_size explicitly, or start low and raise it. (This is not new to r: 0; the same is true of the Spectrum and LISA full-FT paths.)

---

Continual-learning rehearsal (--replay)

Fine-tuning on a new task can erase the old one. Rehearsal is the standard defence: mix a slice of the old data back in.

soup train --config new_task.yaml --replay old_task.jsonl --replay-ratio 0.1

or in soup.yaml:

data:
  train: new_task.jsonl
  replay: old_task.jsonl
  replay_ratio: 0.1      # fraction of the FINAL mixed set
  replay_seed: 0

The ratio is a share of the final set, not of the new data: n_replay = round(r/(1-r) · n_new). At 0.1 over 1000 new rows that is 111 replay rows → 1111 total → exactly 10%. The console reports what it did:

Replay: +26 old rows interleaved (30.2% of 86)

Three guarantees worth knowing:

• Interleaved, never appended. A trailing block of old rows would mean the model sees them all in the final steps — a second mini-finetune, which is the failure rehearsal exists to prevent.
• train only; validation stays pure new-task, so your eval still measures the task you are learning. Measure old-task retention separately with soup eval custom / soup ship.
• An undersized pool reports a shortfall rather than repeating rows — a row seen twice per epoch is a different experiment.

The replay file gets its own format detection, so the old set may be alpaca while the new one is sharegpt.

Scope (v1): sft and pretrain only, and incompatible with packing/multipack — those concatenate rows into fixed blocks, so the ratio stops being meaningful at block boundaries. Both are rejected with a clear error rather than silently mis-mixing.

Honest result. Validated at proof-of-mechanism scale (SmolLM2-135M + LoRA): training task B from a model that knew task A, replay retained A 7% better than a no-replay control (loss 0.565 → 0.526) at a ~5% cost to task B — the expected trade. But forgetting without replay was only +4%, i.e. mild: LoRA on a 135M model barely drifts. The direction and the mechanism are proven; the effect size at full fine-tuning or 7B+ is unproven on a 4 GB box.

Loop Hardening

Six surfaces protect the training loop from the failure modes that cost a real GPU-hour. The schema + math kernels shipped in v0.70.0; the live trainer-callback wiring shipped in v0.71.11, validated end-to-end on SmolLM2-135M.

# Reward-hacking detector — auto-halt when the policy starts gaming the RM
# (InfoRM cluster-separation index, Wang et al. 2024 arXiv:2402.09345)
soup train --config soup.yaml \
    --reward-hack-detector info_rm --reward-hack-halt   # halt on HACK verdict

# Closed-loop reward-hacking MITIGATION (v0.71.26) — detect AND self-correct
soup train --config grpo.yaml --reward-hack-mitigation kl_control   # raise KL, recover
soup train --config grpo.yaml --reward-hack-mitigation log_only     # observe only, no action

# Cross-tokenizer distillation — Llama -> Mistral, no shared vocab needed
# (Universal Logit Distillation, Boizard et al. 2024 arXiv:2402.12030)
soup train --config soup.yaml --uld-strategy wasserstein

# Cross-tokenizer distillation for FULLY-DISJOINT tokenizers (v0.71.18) —
# aligns student/teacher token sequences over decoded character spans, so you
# can distill a GPT-2 BPE student from a Llama SentencePiece teacher.
#   training:
#     uld_strategy: wasserstein_aligned

# MiniLLM reverse-KL on-policy distillation — bundles 3 stability tricks
# (Gu et al. 2024 arXiv:2306.08543)
soup train --config soup.yaml --minillm-enabled \
    --minillm-teacher-mix-ratio 0.3 \
    --minillm-pretrain-anchor-weight 0.1 \
    --minillm-pretrain-anchor-path ./pretrain.jsonl

# MiniLLM TRUE on-policy rollout (v0.71.18, Gu et al. §3.1) — sample a fresh
# autoregressive rollout from the per-token teacher/student mixture each step,
# then length-normalised reverse-KL. training.minillm_rollout_length tunes the
# rollout (auto min(max_length, 32)).
soup train --config soup.yaml --minillm-enabled --minillm-on-policy

# Mid-epoch checkpoint for PPO/GRPO — TorchTune punts this; Soup ships it
soup train --config grpo.yaml \
    --rl-checkpoint-save-every-steps 500 \
    --rl-checkpoint-keep-last 3 \
    --rl-checkpoint-include-optimizer

# Iterative DPO loop driver — sample -> RM-score -> re-pair -> retrain
# (drop --plan-only to run the loop; --plan-only just renders the per-round plan)
soup iterative-dpo \
    --base-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B \
    --reward-model ./output_rm \
    --prompts ./prompts.jsonl \
    --output-dir ./iterative_dpo_out \
    --rounds 5 \
    --pairs-per-round 1000

# RAGEN echo-trap detector — auto-halt when trajectories collapse to self-repetition
# (Zhu et al. 2025 arXiv:2504.14437)
soup train --config grpo.yaml \
    --echo-trap-enabled \
    --echo-trap-threshold 0.6 \
    --echo-trap-halt \
    --echo-trap-tokenizer-aware

--echo-trap-tokenizer-aware switches echo-trap n-grams from whitespace tokens to the active tokenizer's integer ids. This catches subword repetition that punctuation-heavy decoded text can hide, but the score becomes tokenizer-specific rather than vocabulary-agnostic.

Closed-loop reward-hacking auto-mitigation (v0.71.26)

The detectors above halt; training.reward_hack_mitigation (or the --reward-hack-mitigation flag) makes the trainer self-correct mid-run. It requires reward_hack_detector on a grpo/ppo transformers run, and has four modes:

• log_only — observe only. Appends a per-step mitigation_log.jsonl under the run's output dir (the InfoRM/ensemble drop, the OK/WARN/HACK verdict, reward mean/std, completion-length trend, repetition) and provably never mutates β. Run this first to see hacking before you let a controller act on it.
• kl_control — a reversible bang-bang + hysteresis controller. When a multi-signal vote (reward_hack_signals: the detector drop + length_trend + repetition) stays above reward_hack_trip_band for reward_hack_dwell_steps, it multiplies β by reward_hack_kl_gain (clamped to [reward_hack_beta_floor > 0, reward_hack_beta_ceil], never crossing 0); after reward_hack_release_patience below-band steps it relaxes β back toward the floor. Dwell + release-patience stop it flapping. β is written to both trainer.beta and trainer.args.beta so it takes effect on stock GRPO and Soup's GRPO variants (and trainer.args.kl_coef on PPO).
• pid_lagrangian — a PID-Lagrangian controller (Stooke et al. 2020) that holds the hacking signal at reward_hack_signal_target (Kp/Ki/Kd with integral anti-windup via reward_hack_integral_clamp), plus an escalation ladder: raise β → after reward_hack_rollback_patience persistent-HACK steps roll back to the last-good RL checkpoint (needs rl_checkpoint_save_every_steps) → after reward_hack_max_recovery_attempts rollbacks, early-stop with a plain-English give-up explanation.
• Anti-gaming hardening (any control mode): reward_hack_signal_smoothing (ema/median over reward_hack_smoothing_window), reward_hack_conservative_on_disagreement (when detectors disagree, keep KL high + guard against a bimodal reward-distribution collapse), and reward_hack_reward_shaping (subtract a bounded reward_hack_shaping_strength penalty on the gamed proxy — length/repetition/sentinel — over the reward-fn seam).

Scope: proof-of-mechanism only. Validated on SmolLM2-135M + a synthetic length-hacking task on a single RTX 3050 (all four modes live, including a real mid-run rollback). PPO ships BETA — the buffer + kl_coef mutation are wired and unit-tested, but the on-GPU proof is GRPO-only. Whether the loop suppresses hacking without collapsing true reward on 7B+ with a real reward model is an open, community-validatable question. reward_hack_mitigation ∈ {kl_control, pid_lagrangian} is mutually exclusive with ref_model_ema_alpha (both drive the KL/ref dynamics).

Every detector composes with v0.34 soup why (anomaly explainer), v0.32 spike recovery, and the v0.53.11 #127 GRPOStabilityCallback so a single GRPO run can have InfoRM + echo-trap + spike-recovery + in-place ref-model EMA all active simultaneously without duplicating trajectory / state collection. The reward-hack and echo-trap callbacks read the per-step rewards through a shared, thread-safe capture buffer (Soup wraps your reward functions so it never has to monkeypatch TRL); rm_ensemble needs ≥2 reward functions to compute a divergence. The MiniLLM teacher-mix is an offline distribution-blend analog of the paper's on-policy teacher-mixed sampling, and ULD compares the distributions after clamping teacher ids to the teacher vocab (correct for same-family / extended-vocab pairs; a genuinely different tokenization needs a sequence-alignment step). The reference-model EMA (--ref-model-ema-alpha) updates in place — no full state_dict round-trip — so it is cheap at 70B+ scale.

Unlearning (task='unlearn', NPO / SimNPO / RMU)

GDPR right-to-be-forgotten + CSAM/PII leak response, productized. Three method backends:

• NPO — Negative Preference Optimization (DPO-shaped negative-only loss; needs a reference model).
• SimNPO — length-normalised NPO without a ref model (faster, more stable on long sequences).
• RMU — Representation Misdirection Unlearning (residual-stream noise on forget inputs).

# unlearn.yaml
base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M
task: unlearn
data:
  train: traces.jsonl
  forget_set: gdpr_deletion_set.jsonl   # rows to unlearn (messages / prompt+completion / text)
  retain_set: capability_anchors.jsonl  # optional — anchors general capability
training:
  unlearn_method: npo           # or simnpo / rmu
  unlearn_alpha: 0.5            # retain-set weighting [0.0, 10.0]

# Run the unlearn loop (validated on SmolLM2-135M — NPO/SimNPO drive forget loss down).
soup train --config unlearn.yaml --yes

# Score the run on TOFU / MUSE / WMDP (OK / MINOR / MAJOR verdict).
soup eval unlearning <run-id> --benchmark tofu --evidence evidence.json --output report.json

task: unlearn is live (v0.71.9): it loads a LoRA-wrapped policy, a frozen reference copy (NPO / RMU), and the forget / retain JSONL sets, then optimises the per-method loss — NPO's (2/β)·mean(-logσ(-β·(π_logp − ref_logp))) drives the policy's forget-set log-prob below the reference (= forgetting), while the retain set anchors capability. Run NPO/SimNPO with a retain_set — without one the policy has no utility anchor and Soup warns loudly.

Three orthogonal axes: Forget Quality (pre/post forget-loss delta), Model Utility (retain-accuracy preserved), PrivLeak (membership-inference AUC distance from 0.5). Bundled mini-fixtures for all three benchmarks ship in the box (v0.71.1 added MUSE + WMDP alongside the existing TOFU set), so --benchmark muse|wmdp runs without supplying evidence. The WMDP forget-set probes ship redacted (placeholder prompts + REFUSED responses) — Soup never bundles verbatim hazardous-knowledge content.

Continued Pre-training

Continue training a model on raw text for domain adaptation:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
task: pretrain

data:
  train: ./data/corpus.jsonl   # {"text": "..."} or plain .txt files
  format: plaintext
  max_length: 4096

training:
  epochs: 1
  lr: 1e-5
  quantization: 4bit

soup init --template pretrain
soup train

Knowledge Distillation

Train a small student model to match a larger teacher's output distribution.

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M
task: distill
modality: text
backend: transformers

data:
  train: ./data/chat.jsonl
  max_length: 2048
  chat_template: chatml

training:
  teacher_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
  distill_divergence: forward_kl   # kl | forward_kl | reverse_kl | js
  distill_temperature: 2.0
  epochs: 3
  lr: 5e-5
  quantization: 4bit               # quantizes student only

Loss = student CE + (T**2) × KL(teacher_logits / T || student_logits / T). Teacher is loaded once, frozen via requires_grad_(False) + .eval(), and its inputs / logits are auto-bridged across CPU / CUDA devices.

Set distill_mode: sequence (default token) to train on the teacher's generated continuations instead of per-token logit matching — a hard-label, cross-tokenizer-friendly KD that works when student and teacher do not share a vocabulary. sequence mode is mutually exclusive with the cross-tokenizer uld_strategy logit path (they are different objectives over the same task; the trainer rejects the combination at setup). (v0.71.12)

Sequence Classification

Train a classifier head on top of any base model — supports single-label, multi-label, and cross-encoder reranking.

base: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
task: classifier              # or `reranker`, `cross_encoder`
modality: text
backend: transformers

data:
  train: ./data/labelled.jsonl   # rows: {"text": "...", "label": "spam"} or {"text": "...", "label": [0, 1, 0]}
  max_length: 256

training:
  num_labels: 3
  classifier_kind: single_label   # or `multi_label`
  label_names: [ham, spam, promo] # required when labels are strings
  epochs: 5
  lr: 2e-5
  batch_size: 32

Routes classifier / reranker / cross_encoder through AutoModelForSequenceClassification. Multi-label heads cap at 1024 entries per row, dedup via set conversion, and reject null bytes in label strings.

Add a lora: section to train a frozen encoder + LoRA adapter classifier instead of the full model — the small adapter plus the (freshly-initialised) classification head train, the encoder backbone stays frozen:

training:
  num_labels: 3
  lora:
    r: 16
    alpha: 32

(v0.71.12)

Reasoning Effort + EOT Control

gpt-oss-style reasoning-effort control for instruction tuning.

training:
  reasoning_effort: high      # low | medium | high
  train_on_eot: true          # do NOT mask the EOT/EOS token in the loss

reasoning_effort injects <|reasoning_effort|>high<|/reasoning_effort|> into the system turn (creating one if absent). train_on_eot=True makes the model learn when to stop generating by training on the trailing EOS token instead of masking it out. Both are gated to the SFT-family of tasks.

EBFT / GDPO Loss Variants

Entropy-regularised SFT (ebft_variant: structured | strided) and generalised DPO (gdpo_variant: standard | length_normalized | margin) — both attach idempotently via compute_loss wrappers and auto-fire when the corresponding variant field is set on TrainingConfig.

# SFT with EBFT structured
training:
  ebft_variant: structured
  ebft_temperature: 1.0

# DPO with GDPO length_normalized
task: dpo
training:
  gdpo_variant: length_normalized
  dpo_beta: 0.1

GRPO Objective Variants

Soup ships live math kernels for 6 GRPO objective variants in addition to the default. Set grpo_variant in training and the trainer automatically subclasses trl.GRPOTrainer to route compute_loss through the matching kernel:

task: grpo
training:
  reward_fn: accuracy
  num_generations: 4
  grpo_variant: gspo         # group-stabilised importance ratio
  # or: dapo / dr_grpo / bnpo / rft / two_sided
  # grpo_delta: 0.2          # required when grpo_variant=two_sided

Variants:

• standard — DeepSeek-R1-style baseline (delegates to TRL's compute_loss).
• gspo — group-stabilised importance ratio with per-batch control variate.
• dapo — decoupled asymmetric clipping (eps_lo=0.2, eps_hi=0.28).
• dr_grpo — token-sum without per-sample length normalisation.
• bnpo — length-normalised PPO surrogate.
• two_sided — symmetric clipping with operator-supplied grpo_delta.
• rft — rejection-sampling fine-tuning (only positive-advantage tokens contribute).

The stability callback (EMA ref-model update, replay buffer, TIS alert counter) attaches automatically when any of ref_model_ema_alpha / replay_buffer_size / tis_threshold / etc. is set.

Process Reward Model (PRM)

Train a scalar reward head over stepwise-supervised reasoning chains. Data format is the v0.42.0 prm shape — one row per {prompt, completions: [step1, step2, ...], labels: [r1, r2, ...]}:

task: prm
data:
  format: prm
  train: ./prm_train.jsonl
  max_length: 2048
training:
  epochs: 1
  lr: 1.0e-5

The trainer loads AutoModelForCausalLM, attaches an nn.Linear(hidden, 1) reward head, and computes MSE between predicted scalars at step-boundary tokens and the per-step labels. The reward head is saved inside the model checkpoint (reward_head.* in model.safetensors) and the tokenizer is saved alongside it, so the resulting directory is loadable standalone.

PRM-guided GRPO (process-supervised RL)

Use a trained PRM as the per-step reward inside GRPO — the o1-era process-supervision signal. Set training.prm_reward to a PRM directory (a task=prm checkpoint) or HF id; the PRM splits each generated completion into reasoning steps (newline heuristic), scores every step with its reward head, and folds the per-step scores into one scalar reward that GRPO optimises. It replaces reward_fn and rides the existing reward-shaping + reward-hack-mitigation seam, so the v0.71.26 controller still observes it (TRL logs it as rewards/prm_reward).

task: grpo
backend: transformers        # required (the PRM reward runs a transformers forward)
modality: text               # required
data:
  format: chatml
  train: ./grpo_prompts.jsonl
training:
  prm_reward: ./my-prm       # a `soup train task=prm` checkpoint dir (or HF id)
  prm_aggregate: min         # weakest-link (default) | prod | last
  num_generations: 4
  grpo_beta: 0.04

prm_aggregate='min' (weakest-link, the standard PRM aggregation) is the safe default; prod assumes calibrated [0,1] step scores (Soup's PRM head is trained with unconstrained MSE, so prod can blow up on uncalibrated labels).

Bundled rollout environments. Three deterministic pure-Python toy environments seed the openenv rollout path out-of-the-box — pair any of them with rollout_backend=openenv:

training:
  rollout_backend: openenv
  rollout_func: soup_cli.envs.calculator:rollout   # or retrieval_qa / guess_number
  reward_fn: verifiable
  verifiable_domain: math

Ready-made recipes: grpo-env-calculator, grpo-env-retrieval-qa, grpo-env-guess-number. The environments are deterministic single-shot prompt/answer seeders (the live openenv contract passes only the seed prompts, not the model) — not interactive multi-turn episodes.

Scope: proof-of-mechanism only — validated on SmolLM2-135M with a tiny synthetic PRM (the PRM reward scores good completions above bad and drives GRPO's advantages). Not a production reward-model claim; scale validation is help-wanted (#286).

Online DPO (task='online_dpo') — judge in the loop (v0.71.31)

Unlike offline DPO (static prompt/chosen/rejected rows), Online DPO generates two completions per prompt on-policy each step and asks a judge — or a reward model — which is better; the winner becomes chosen, the loser rejected. The judge closes the loop. Wraps TRL OnlineDPOTrainer; data is prompt-only (like GRPO). Transformers + text only.

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct
task: online_dpo
data:
  train: ./data/prompts.jsonl      # prompt-only (or any format — prompts are extracted)
training:
  online_dpo_judge: "ollama://llama3.1"   # a pairwise judge (ollama://|https://|http://localhost)
  # OR: reward_model: ./my-reward-model   # exactly one of judge / reward_model
  online_dpo_loss_type: sigmoid           # sigmoid | ipo
  online_dpo_max_new_tokens: 64
  dpo_beta: 0.1
  lora: { r: 8, alpha: 16, target_modules: auto }

The judge is Soup's own OpenAI-compatible JudgeEvaluator adapted to TRL's BasePairwiseJudge (swap-debiased: a winner is only recorded when both A,B and B,A orders agree). Recipe: online-dpo-smollm2-135m. Proof-of-mechanism was validated on SmolLM2-135M with a synthetic judge (not a production RLHF claim; #286).

Weighted Multi-Objective Preference Loss

Mix DPO / SimPO / ORPO / IPO terms in one training run by setting preference_loss_weights (must sum to 1.0):

task: preference
training:
  preference_loss_weights:
    dpo: 0.6
    simpo: 0.4

The combine wrapper reads policy + reference summed log-probs from the inner TRL trainer's per-batch inputs and computes a true weighted sum via the in-tree compute_dpo_term / compute_simpo_term / compute_orpo_term / compute_ipo_term kernels. BCO cannot be mixed with paired losses (data format incompatible — rejected at config load).

MoE Model Support

Fine-tune Mixture of Experts models (Mixtral, Qwen3-30B-A3B, DeepSeek V3) with ScatterMoE LoRA — applies LoRA to both attention layers and expert FFN layers:

base: Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B
task: sft

training:
  moe_lora: true              # target expert + attention layers
  moe_aux_loss_coeff: 0.01    # router load-balancing loss
  quantization: 4bit

Soup auto-detects MoE architectures. Works with all training tasks.

soup init --template moe
soup train

Vision / Multimodal Fine-tuning

Fine-tune vision-language models (LLaMA-3.2-Vision, Qwen2-VL, Pixtral) on image+text data:

# Install vision support
pip install "soup-cli[vision]"

# Create a vision config
soup init --template vision

# Train
soup train --config soup.yaml

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
task: sft
modality: vision

data:
  train: ./data/vision_train.jsonl
  format: llava
  image_dir: ./data/images
  val_split: 0.1

training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 1e-5
  quantization: 4bit
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16

Supported vision data formats:

LLaVA:

{"image": "photo.jpg", "conversations": [{"from": "human", "value": "<image>\nDescribe this image."}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "A cat on a mat."}]}

ShareGPT4V:

{"image": "chart.png", "conversations": [{"from": "human", "value": "<image>\nWhat does this show?"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Quarterly revenue."}]}

soup data inspect automatically shows image statistics (count, formats, missing files) for vision datasets.

Audio / Speech Fine-tuning

Fine-tune audio-language models (Qwen2-Audio, Whisper) on audio+text data:

# Install audio support
pip install "soup-cli[audio]"

# Create an audio config
soup init --template audio

# Train
soup train --config soup.yaml

base: Qwen/Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct
task: sft
modality: audio

data:
  train: ./data/audio_train.jsonl
  format: audio
  audio_dir: ./data/audio
  val_split: 0.1

training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 1e-5
  quantization: 4bit
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16

Audio data format:

{"audio": "recording.wav", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Transcribe this audio."}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Hello world."}]}

ASR fine-tuning (task='asr', Whisper) — v0.71.32

Fine-tune Whisper on your accent or domain. whisper-tiny (39M) and base (74M) train on a 4 GB GPU. Rows are {"audio": <path>, "text": <transcript>} under data.format='asr'; audio decodes to 16 kHz mono through the hardened loader.

base: openai/whisper-tiny
task: asr
data:
  train: ./data/train.jsonl
  format: asr                 # rows: {"audio": "clip.wav", "text": "hello world"}
  audio_dir: ./data/audio     # audio paths resolve here (containment-checked)
training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 1e-4
  batch_size: 2
  asr_language: en            # optional; sets + persists the decoder prefix
  asr_task: transcribe        # transcribe | translate
  asr_lora: true              # optional LoRA on q/v; default = full fine-tune
  quantization: none
output: ./out

{"audio": "clip0.wav", "text": "hello world"}

Transcribe + score after training:

soup infer --task asr --model ./out --input eval.jsonl --output preds.jsonl --audio-dir ./data/audio
# -> preds carry {"transcription", "wer", "cer"} per row + a corpus WER summary

Notes: task='asr' requires backend='transformers' and a Whisper base (a non-Whisper base is rejected before download). asr_language/asr_task persist to an asr_generation.json sidecar so soup infer --task asr restores them (override with --asr-language/--asr-task). WER/CER use a light normalizer — good for before/after deltas, not leaderboard-comparable absolutes. whisper-large-v3-asr ships parse-only (needs a larger GPU).

GRPO Plus — Objective Variants, Long-Context RL, Multi-Turn Agents

Soup ships seven GRPO objective variants, between-rollouts vLLM standby, four agent-rollout backends, seven stability/efficiency knobs, plus Process Reward Models and Vision-RL.

# soup.yaml — DAPO with replay buffer and TIS truncation masking
base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: grpo
data:
  train: ./prompts.jsonl
  format: chatml
training:
  reward_fn: accuracy
  num_generations: 8
  # New: GRPO objective variants
  grpo_variant: dapo                  # one of: gspo / dapo / dr_grpo / bnpo / two_sided / rft / standard
  # grpo_delta: 0.2                   # required when grpo_variant: two_sided
  grpo_fp16: true                     # FP16 RL (unsloth parity)
  # Long-context + memory-efficient RL
  long_context_grpo: true             # wires Tiled MLP when available
  vllm_sleep_mode: true               # between-rollouts vLLM standby — LIVE (vLLM >= 0.7)
  # Multi-turn agent rollout — openenv is LIVE: your function's rows replace the prompt dataset
  rollout_backend: openenv            # one of: art / ruler / nemo_gym / openenv
  rollout_func: my_module:my_rollout  # module:function resolver (openenv; trusted operator code)
  # Stability / efficiency knobs
  ref_model_ema_alpha: 0.99           # EMA sync policy → reference
  replay_buffer_size: 2048
  async_grpo_prefetch: true           # overlap rollout + train
  tis_threshold: 2.0                  # truncated importance sampling
  mask_truncated_completions: true    # paired with tis_threshold
  defer_rerolling: true
  skip_zero_advantage: true
  off_policy_mask_threshold: 0.5

Process Reward Models (stepwise-supervised):

# soup.yaml
base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
task: prm                              # New: Process Reward Model
data:
  train: ./prm_dataset.jsonl
  format: prm                          # stepwise-supervised data shape
training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 1e-5

Vision RL on Qwen2-VL / Pixtral / InternVL:

# soup.yaml
base: Qwen/Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
task: grpo
modality: vision
data:
  train: ./vlm_prompts.jsonl
  format: llava
training:
  reward_fn: accuracy
  vision_grpo: true                    # VLM-RL opt-in

All flags ship as schema gates in v0.50.0; live loss kernels, vLLM sleep-mode plumbing, ART/RULER/NeMo Gym/OpenEnv launchers, and the PRM trainer wrapper land in v0.50.1 — schema accepts the values now so configs are stable.

DPO Training

Train with preference data using Direct Preference Optimization:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: dpo

data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo

training:
  epochs: 3
  dpo_beta: 0.1
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

Preference Variety — BCO + Unified Dispatcher + KL Variants

Five preference losses live behind one config knob. Pick a loss without renaming your task, anneal β over training, and periodically refresh the frozen reference.

BCO (Binary Classifier Optimization)

Same input format as DPO; rows are split internally to TRL's BCO unpaired schema ({prompt, completion, label}).

task: bco
data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo
training:
  bco_beta: 0.1

Unified preference dispatcher

Use task: preference + training.preference_loss to swap losses without touching task. Hyperparameter sweeps over the loss type itself become trivial.

task: preference
data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo
training:
  preference_loss: dpo   # or simpo, orpo, ipo, bco

Legacy task: dpo / task: simpo / etc. remain first-class — the unified surface is additive.

KL-controlled DPO variants

Anneal β over training, periodically refresh the reference model:

task: dpo   # or task: preference + preference_loss: dpo, or task: ipo
training:
  dpo_beta: 0.1
  dpo_beta_schedule: linear   # linear | cosine | exponential
  dpo_beta_end: 0.01
  dpo_ref_regen_epochs: 2     # copy student → ref model every 2 epochs

Both controls are gated to DPO-family tasks (dpo, ipo, or preference with preference_loss in {dpo, ipo}); transformers backend only.

Multi-objective preference loss (schema-only in v0.40.0)

task: preference
training:
  preference_loss_weights: {dpo: 0.7, bco: 0.3}

Schema validates 2–5 entries summing to 1. Live runtime weighted-loss combination is wired in v0.40.1; v0.40.0 fails fast with an actionable NotImplementedError if you actually try to train (same stub-then-live pattern as v0.27.0 MII / v0.37.0 multipack / v0.38.0 quant menu / v0.39.0 ReLoRA).

GRPO Training (Reasoning)

Train reasoning models with Group Relative Policy Optimization (DeepSeek-R1 style):

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: grpo

data:
  train: ./data/reasoning_train.jsonl
  format: sharegpt
  max_length: 4096

training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 1e-5
  grpo_beta: 0.1
  num_generations: 4
  reward_fn: accuracy   # or 'format', or path to custom .py
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

# Create a reasoning config
soup init --template reasoning

# Train
soup train --config soup.yaml

Built-in reward functions:

• accuracy — checks if the final answer matches expected (supports #### and \boxed{} formats)
• format — checks for structured <think>...</think> reasoning blocks

Custom reward functions — point to a Python file:

# my_reward.py
def reward_fn(completions, **kwargs):
    """Score each completion. Return list of floats."""
    return [1.0 if "correct" in c[-1]["content"] else 0.0 for c in completions]

training:
  reward_fn: ./my_reward.py

Reward ensembles — list several rewards, comma-separated, and they combine (GRPO only). This also unlocks the rm_ensemble reward-hack detector, which needs ≥ 2 rewards:

training:
  reward_fn: "accuracy,format"   # both are scored every step

Synthesize a verifier from your data (soup reward synth)

Don't hand-write a verifier — generate one from reference (gold) outputs. Soup infers a deterministic verifier (numeric / JSON-schema / regex / tool-call), writes a readable, editable .py, and refuses to emit one that can't tell your references from auto-generated bad answers (the mandatory calibration report). The emitted file is a normal reward_fn: reward.py.

# infer + calibrate + emit (exit 0 kept, 2 refused, 1 error)
soup reward synth references.jsonl -o reward.py --output-report calib.json

# preview the induced spec without writing anything
soup reward synth references.jsonl --plan-only

# force a family instead of auto-detecting
soup reward synth answers.jsonl -o reward.py --kind numeric --tolerance 1e-6

References are a JSONL where each row's gold answer is in an answer field (override with --field) or the last assistant turn of a messages list. --min-discrimination sets how strongly the verifier must separate references from perturbed negatives before it's emitted. v1 is deterministic families only — a \boxed{}/#### marker helps the numeric verifier, and completions are prompted to mark their answer (standard RLVR practice).

Stress-test a verifier for gameability (soup reward stress)

A verifier that passes calibration still might pay out for junk. soup reward stress feeds the verifier deterministic degenerate completions — empty, length-padded, repeated, and sentinel-spam — scored against your real gold answers, and flags any it accepts. It's the adversarial counterpart to synth: calibration proves the verifier tells references from friendly bad answers; stress asks whether a reward-hacking model could game it.

# probe a synthesized verifier (or any reward .py) — exit 0 robust, 2 gameable, 1 error
soup reward stress reward.py --references golds.jsonl --output-report stress.json

# probe a builtin verifier instead of a .py file
soup reward stress verifiable --verifiable-domain math --references golds.jsonl

# tune the attack set / accept threshold / gameability tolerance
soup reward stress reward.py --references golds.jsonl \
    --attacks empty,length,repetition,sentinel --sentinel GOLD \
    --threshold 0.5 --max-gameable 0.0

The report shows a per-attack accept-rate and an overall verdict. A gold-requiring verifier probed with no --references is a hard error (it can't be measured), never a false "robust". Probing a .py executes its module code, like any custom reward — only stress files you trust.

Verifiable Rewards (RLVR)

Use reward_fn: verifiable with a verifiable_domain for deterministic, math-checkable rewards — no judge model, no heuristics. Great for GRPO on math, code, or structured-output tasks.

training:
  reward_fn: verifiable
  verifiable_domain: math          # or: code, json_schema
  num_generations: 4

Three built-in domains:

Domain	What it checks
math	Extracts the final numeric answer (supports ####, \boxed{}) and compares via float() equality — no eval() on user output
code	Executes generated Python with a 5s timeout, 512 MB RLIMIT on POSIX, python -I -S, socket patch, ephemeral cwd. Output capped at 10KB. Warning panel on first use
json_schema	Validates output against a JSON Schema provided per-example in the dataset

Note: code domain runs untrusted generations. Soup sandboxes aggressively but never trust it for production-grade isolation — run in a VM or container for public data.

Tool-Calling Fine-Tuning

Train models to emit structured function calls (OpenAI-style tool_calls with JSON arguments).

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: sft

data:
  train: ./data/tool_calls.jsonl
  format: tool-calling

training:
  epochs: 3
  lr: 2e-5
  quantization: 4bit

Tool-calling data format:

{"messages": [
  {"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather in Paris?"},
  {"role": "assistant", "tool_calls": [
    {"id": "c1", "type": "function",
     "function": {"name": "get_weather", "arguments": "{\"city\": \"Paris\"}"}}
  ]}
]}

Arguments are parsed as JSON only — never eval(). soup eval custom can score tool-call accuracy (function name + argument JSON equality).

soup init --template tool-calling

PPO / Full RLHF Pipeline

Train models with the full RLHF pipeline: SFT warmup → Reward Model → PPO alignment.

# Create an RLHF config
soup init --template rlhf

Step 1: SFT warmup — fine-tune a base model on your data:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: sft
data:
  train: ./data/train.jsonl
  format: alpaca
output: ./output_sft

Step 2: Train reward model — learn preferences from human feedback:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: reward_model
data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo
output: ./output_rm

Step 3: PPO alignment — optimize the policy using the reward model:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: ppo
data:
  train: ./data/prompts.jsonl
  format: chatml
training:
  reward_model: ./output_rm
  ppo_epochs: 4
  ppo_clip_ratio: 0.2
  ppo_kl_penalty: 0.05
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit
output: ./output_ppo

PPO supports two reward sources:

• Reward model (reward_model): pre-trained reward model (from step 2)
• Reward function (reward_fn): callable function (same as GRPO — accuracy, format, or custom .py)

KTO Training (Unpaired Preferences)

Train with unpaired preference data — no need for chosen+rejected pairs:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: kto

data:
  train: ./data/kto_train.jsonl
  format: kto

training:
  epochs: 3
  kto_beta: 0.1
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

KTO data format:

{"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "completion": "4", "label": true}
{"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "completion": "Fish", "label": false}

ORPO Training (No Reference Model)

ORPO combines SFT and alignment in one step — no reference model needed:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: orpo

data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo

training:
  epochs: 3
  orpo_beta: 0.1
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

SimPO Training (Simple Preference)

SimPO uses length-normalized log probabilities as implicit rewards — reference-free:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: simpo

data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo

training:
  epochs: 3
  simpo_gamma: 0.5
  cpo_alpha: 1.0
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

IPO Training (Regularized Preference)

IPO is a theoretically grounded DPO variant with stronger regularization:

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
task: ipo

data:
  train: ./data/preferences.jsonl
  format: dpo

training:
  epochs: 3
  ipo_tau: 0.1
  lora:
    r: 64
    alpha: 16
  quantization: 4bit

RAFT — Retrieval-Augmented Fine-Tuning

When you need a model to cite the document it's reading instead of hallucinating, RAFT (Stanford 2024) is the canonical recipe. Each training row carries a query, a golden document, a list of distractor documents, and the answer — the model learns to attend to the relevant doc while ignoring the noise.

# soup.yaml
data:
  train: ./data/raft.jsonl
  format: raft

training:
  citation_faithful: true        # enable citation precision/recall scoring
  citation_style: bracket        # cite as [doc-1] inline
  citation_recall_threshold: 0.8 # gate final save on recall >= 80%

# RAFT JSONL row shape
{"query": "When was Python released?", "golden_doc": "Python was released in 1991 by Guido van Rossum.", "distractor_docs": ["Ruby was released in 1995.", "Java was released in 1995."], "answer": "1991 [doc-1]"}

# Ready-made 8B Llama recipe
soup recipes show raft-llama3-8b
soup recipes use raft-llama3-8b

Citation scoring is exposed as a pure kernel for the eval gate:

from soup_cli.utils.citation_faithful import score_citations

score = score_citations(
    predicted="The answer is 1991 [doc-1].",
    expected_ids=("doc-1",),
)
# CitationScore(precision=1.0, recall=1.0, f1=1.0, predicted_count=1, expected_count=1)

Citation-faithful FT is gated to task in {sft, pretrain} + data.format='raft' — misconfigured runs fail at config load with a named-field message.

Under the hood, a format: raft run trains answer-only: each row is composed into a prompt (golden + distractor docs, shuffled deterministically by data.raft_shuffle_seed, each labelled [doc-N]) followed by the answer; the prompt span is masked out of the loss and — when citation_faithful: true — the bracketed [doc-id] spans in the answer get a boosted per-token loss weight. Rows whose prompt fills max_length (answer fully truncated) are dropped with a warning rather than silently shrinking the dataset.

By default the document order is fixed for the whole run. Set data.raft_epoch_shuffle: true to re-permute the golden + distractor documents each epoch (a per-epoch salt folded into the shuffle seed) so the model can't latch onto a fixed citation slot — useful for multi-epoch runs. epoch=0 reproduces the legacy single-permutation order exactly, so enabling it never changes the first epoch. (v0.71.17)

Score a trained model's citations from the CLI:

# {predicted, expected_ids} rows, OR RAFT rows scored against their own golden [doc-N]
soup eval citation preds.jsonl --style bracket
# RAFT rows: pass the train-time shuffle seed so the golden id lines up
soup eval citation raft.jsonl --shuffle-seed 0 --output citation.json

soup diagnose also gains a citation failure mode that flags a model that stopped citing the supporting document.

RA-DIT — Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning

RA-DIT (Meta 2023) is the two-stage version of RAFT: first train a sentence-transformer retriever (contrastive), then fine-tune the generator on the RAFT-style rows. Two recipes ship paired:

# Stage 1 — train the retriever (uses Soup's v0.16 embedding trainer)
soup recipes use ra-dit-retriever
soup train

# Stage 2 — train the generator on RAFT data, pointing at the retriever
soup recipes use ra-dit-llama3-8b
soup train

The schema enforces stage-task pairing — ra_dit_stage: retriever requires task: embedding; ra_dit_stage: generator requires task: sft. A misconfigured recipe fails at config load with a named-field message.

Run both stages in one command with soup ra-dit:

soup ra-dit --retriever-config retriever.yaml --generator-config generator.yaml
# preview the plan + the resolved retriever link without training:
soup ra-dit -r retriever.yaml -g generator.yaml --plan-only

It trains the retriever, then records that trained retriever as the generator's paired retriever (writing its output dir into the generator's training.ra_dit_retriever_model) and trains the generator RAFT-style. The recorded retriever is the one used at deploy/serve time — stage-2 does not fuse the retriever weights. A plain soup train of a generator-stage config with no retriever model set auto-links the most-recent RA-DIT retriever run from the Registry; pass --retriever-model <m> to override.

Curriculum-Aware Training (BETA)

Layer dynamic re-weighting on top of the static curriculum bucketer. Every N steps the trainer aggregates per-sample loss + grad-norm into a per-bucket uncertainty signal, runs it through a softmax (temperature-controlled) with floor (water-filling so no bucket drops below curriculum_dynamic_floor), and re-weights the sampler. Empty buckets fall back to the median of populated buckets; degenerate inputs return uniform.

training:
  curriculum: true                          # static bucketer (v0.23.0)
  curriculum_buckets: 4
  curriculum_metric: perplexity             # length (default) | loss | perplexity
  curriculum_dynamic: true                  # NEW — dynamic re-weighting
  curriculum_dynamic_recompute_steps: 50    # refresh every 50 global steps
  curriculum_dynamic_floor: 0.05            # min weight per bucket
  curriculum_dynamic_temperature: 1.0       # softmax temp on uncertainty

Bucketing by difficulty percentile (v0.71.5). When curriculum_metric is loss or perplexity, the dynamic callback assigns each step's sample to a bucket by its rank within a rolling 512-step window of the difficulty signal (perplexity = exp(min(loss, 50))), instead of the round-robin fallback used for length. This keeps the buckets calibrated to the live loss distribution rather than a static length sort. length (the default) keeps the round-robin assignment.

Visualise the recorded bucket-weight evolution with soup runs curriculum-curve <run_id>.

DDP / grad-accum safety: multi-rank launches must wire an all_reduce hook on per-bucket stats (a cross-validator rejects un-coordinated multi-rank runs upfront). Multi-trainer expansion beyond sft / pretrain is tracked for v0.48.1.

TTS Fine-Tuning (task='tts', BETA, live in v0.71.20)

Live as of v0.71.20 (lifted from the v0.52.0 schema stub). The five families (orpheus, sesame_csm, llasa, spark, oute) are all decoder language models, so a TTS fine-tune is next-token cross-entropy over interleaved [text][audio-codec-token] chat sequences — the same objective the SFT trainer already runs. TTSTrainerWrapper reuses the SFT model/tokenizer/LoRA/CE machinery and adds two TTS-specific pieces: per-family emotion-control templating and registration of operator-supplied codec special tokens.

There are two workflows:

Pre-encoded chat (live, validated). Run the family's audio codec offline so the assistant turn already contains the discrete codec-token string, then train with data.format: chat. This is plain cross-entropy and runs on any GPU (validated end-to-end on SmolLM2-135M-Instruct).

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct   # or canopylabs/orpheus-3b-0.1-ft
task: tts
modality: audio_out
data:
  train: ./data/tts_pre_encoded.jsonl   # assistant turns carry codec tokens
  format: chat
  new_special_tokens: ["<|codec_0|>", "<|codec_1|>"]   # your codec vocab
training:
  tts_family: orpheus
  tts_emotion: neutral   # Orpheus + Oute only
  lora: true

Operator-supplied data.new_special_tokens are registered (deduplicated, only tokens not already in the vocab) and the embedding matrix is resized through the (possibly PEFT-wrapped) model so the codec-token ids have rows. Orpheus + Oute support emotion conditioning via training.tts_emotion from a per-family allowlist (Orpheus: neutral / happy / sad / angry / excited / calm / whisper / laugh; Oute: neutral / happy / sad / angry / calm / excited) — the wrapper prepends the family's emotion control string to the first user turn.

Live-codec (hardware/dependency-gated). Setting data.format: audio asks the trainer to encode raw audio into codec tokens at train time, which needs the family's heavyweight codec package (snac for Orpheus, moshi for Sesame-CSM, xcodec2 for Llasa, sparktts for Spark, outetts for Oute). The Orpheus path is live — install pip install snac and a 24 kHz mono wav is encoded to SNAC codec tokens end-to-end (audio is duration- and byte-capped and read through an O_NOFOLLOW fd). The other four families still surface a friendly per-family RuntimeError naming the required pip install and are not yet validated on the maintainer's box — use the pre-encoded workflow above for a runnable fine-tune with those.

Five ready-made recipes ship: orpheus-tts-sft, sesame-csm-tts, llasa-tts, spark-tts, oute-tts — copy with soup recipes use <name>. Cross-validators reject the mlx backend, modality != audio_out, and emotion tags outside the per-family allowlist.

Classifier / Reranker / Cross-Encoder Training (BETA, v0.52.0)

Three new task types build on the existing embedding trainer: task: classifier (single-label or multi-label sequence classification), task: reranker (pointwise retrieval scoring), task: cross_encoder (paired-input scoring). Schema-only; live trainer wrapper in v0.52.1.

base: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
task: classifier
data:
  train: ./data/classification.jsonl
training:
  num_labels: 3
  classifier_kind: single_label
  label_names: [negative, neutral, positive]

num_labels is bounded [1, 1024] with explicit bool-before-int rejection; label_names (optional) must be unique, ≤128 chars each, and match num_labels in length when set.

Knowledge Distillation (BETA, v0.52.0)

New task: distill with training.teacher_model (HF id or local path), training.distill_divergence (kl / forward_kl / reverse_kl / js — kl canonicalises to forward_kl), and training.distill_temperature (bounded [0.05, 100.0], finite-only). Schema-only; live loop in v0.52.1.

base: meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B
task: distill
data:
  train: ./data/distill.jsonl
training:
  teacher_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
  distill_divergence: forward_kl
  distill_temperature: 2.0

The cross-validator rejects task='distill' without teacher_model, and rejects teacher_model / distill_* fields when task is anything other than distill.

EBFT + GDPO (BETA, v0.52.0)

Energy-Based Fine-Tuning (axolotl) lands as training.ebft_variant ∈ {structured, strided} + training.ebft_temperature (bounded [1e-4, 100.0]). Gated to task: sft. Generalized DPO lands as training.gdpo_variant ∈ {standard, length_normalized, margin} — gated to task ∈ {dpo, preference}. Live loss kernels in v0.52.1.

gpt-oss reasoning_effort + train_on_eot (v0.52.0)

training.reasoning_effort: low | medium | high injects a system-prefix token at training time for gpt-oss models; training.train_on_eot: true includes explicit EOT/EOS control tokens in the SFT loss (axolotl train_on_eot). Both are gated to the SFT-family task set (sft / pretrain / distill / classifier / reranker / cross_encoder) — setting them on DPO / GRPO / PPO / etc. fails at config load. Live formatter wiring in v0.52.1.

MoLE — Per-Token Adapter Routing (task='moe_lora_routing')

Train a small gating network that routes each token to a weighted blend of N frozen task LoRAs (Mixture of LoRA Experts, Wu et al. 2024). The base model and every task adapter stay frozen — only the router learns which adapter(s) each token should use.

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M
task: moe_lora_routing
modality: text
backend: transformers

data:
  train: ./data/chat.jsonl
  max_length: 512

training:
  mole_task_adapters:        # 2-64 LoRA adapter paths (HF ids or local dirs)
    - ./adapters/math
    - ./adapters/code
    - ./adapters/chat
  mole_top_k: 2              # 1 <= top_k <= len(mole_task_adapters)
  mole_temperature: 1.0      # [1e-6, 100.0]
  epochs: 1

The gate is the only trainable parameter; it is saved as mole_gate.pt alongside the run. compute_loss runs N+1 forwards per step (base + each adapter under torch.no_grad(), blended by the per-token gate weights) so step time scales with the number of task adapters. Training only — there is no serve-time MoLE path yet. (v0.71.12)

Architecture Knobs — Mixture-of-Depths, LLaMA Pro, LongLoRA

Three architecture transforms that were schema-only are now live for SFT / Pretrain on Llama / Qwen / Mistral (LongLoRA also covers Phi). All apply at trainer setup:

training:
  # Mixture-of-Depths (arXiv 2404.02258): route only the top-k tokens through each
  # block. capacity_factor is the fraction of tokens that get the residual update.
  use_mod: true
  mod_capacity_factor: 0.125

  # LLaMA Pro: append zero-initialised identity decoder blocks and train only the new
  # ones (freeze_trainable_layers freezes the originals).
  expand_layers: 4
  freeze_trainable_layers: 4

  # LongLoRA S²: shifted-sparse attention on the Q/K projections for long-context tuning.
  use_longlora: true

use_mod / expand_layers attach AFTER get_peft_model so the new routers / blocks are trainable. Unsupported architectures warn + skip (MoD, block expansion); use_longlora is rejected at the schema gate for non-supported arches and for use_ring_attention / FlashAttention-3. Pick one of MoD / LLaMA Pro / LongLoRA per run. (v0.71.12)

Spectrum — Targeted Training on Layer SNR (soup spectrum scan, v0.71.23)

Spectrum (arXiv:2406.06623) fine-tunes only the layers with the most signal. soup spectrum scan streams a model's .safetensors shards one tensor at a time — there is no model load, so it runs on a CPU box even for very large models — and computes a singular-value signal-to-noise ratio per weight matrix with a Marchenko-Pastur noise threshold. It ranks the layers within each module-type group and prints the top --top-percent as a ready-to-paste config block:

soup spectrum scan --model HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M --top-percent 25 --modules mlp,attn -o patch.yaml

# patch.yaml — paste into your soup.yaml
training:
  unfrozen_parameters:
  - model.layers.0.mlp.down_proj
  - model.layers.29.self_attn.v_proj
  # ...

Then train with the patch — the SFT trainer freezes every parameter and unfreezes only the matched set (full fine-tuning, LoRA off):

base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M
task: sft
training:
  quantization: none        # Spectrum trains float weights — quantization off
  unfrozen_parameters:
  - model.layers.0.mlp.down_proj
  - model.layers.29.self_attn.v_proj

unfrozen_parameters entries are regex patterns matched against parameter names. It requires task: sft, backend: transformers, modality: text, and quantization: none, and is mutually exclusive with LoRA features (use_dora / use_vera / moe_lora / relora_steps / …) and the other freezing knobs (freeze_layers / freeze_ratio / train_router_only / expand_layers) — a conflicting combo is rejected loudly at config load. Scans cache under ~/.soup/spectrum/ (override with SOUP_SPECTRUM_CACHE_DIR); --no-cache skips it. --modules mlp,attn (vs the all default) is recommended for very large models — it skips the giant embedding/lm_head matrices. The SNR kernel is pure-numpy and transpose-invariant, so GPT-2 Conv1D weights score the same as Linear weights. (v0.71.23)