Date checked: 2026-08-02 MisakaNet version: v2.14.0 Glama listing: https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/Ikalus1988/MisakaNet Related issue: #764
MisakaNet MCP server works locally; Glama listing exists; Glama Gateway/tool-call analytics has not discovered or routed MisakaNet tools yet.
This is not "MCP broken" or "0 usage". It is an analytics/gateway counting boundary: Glama currently shows 0 Glama-routed tool calls, while local stdio MCP calls are working and should not be described as "0 usage".
For zsxh / external PRs / awesome-list listings, use this framing:
MisakaNet is already registered as an MCP server and local MCP usage works. The current Glama issue is not MCP functionality. It is an analytics / gateway counting boundary: Glama currently shows 0 Glama-routed tool calls, while local stdio MCP calls are working and should not be described as "0 usage".
Do not say:
- "MisakaNet has 0 usage"
- "MCP integration needs to be fixed"
- "We need to register as an MCP server" (already registered)
- Clarify Glama counting boundary – document that Tool Calls = 0 is a measurement gap, not a failure
- Check Glama Gateway support – confirm whether Glama can host/route MisakaNet tools (see Follow-up below)
- Improve first-call docs – copy-paste config, recommended first query, expected output
- Do not frame any of this as "MCP broken"
Current Glama docs indicate the platform does support both hosted MCP deployments and a Gateway endpoint for routed calls:
- Hosting: https://glama.ai/mcp/hosting
- Gateway: https://glama.ai/mcp/gateway
That means the remaining question is narrower than "can Glama do MCP?" The open question is whether MisakaNet currently has a deployed hosted endpoint / routed connection profile, or only a directory listing with analytics that still reports zero routed calls.
If a hosted endpoint exists, the next valid test is one tools/call through that endpoint and then a delayed analytics re-check.
Command:
Invoke-RestMethod -Uri 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Ikalus1988/MisakaNet' | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 10Observed key fields on 2026-08-02:
{
"id": "dr8pugtliz",
"name": "MisakaNet",
"namespace": "Ikalus1988",
"repository": { "url": "https://github.com/Ikalus1988/MisakaNet" },
"tools": [],
"url": "https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/dr8pugtliz"
}Interpretation: the Glama listing exists, but Glama does not currently expose discovered tool metadata for MisakaNet through this API response.
Local stdio calls are working independently of Glama:
initializereturned server namemisakanet.tools/listreturnedmisakanet_search,misakanet_get_lesson,misakanet_submit_usage, andmisakanet_usage_status.tools/callformisakanet_searchwith querydatabase lockedreturned SAG-Lite results.tools/callformisakanet_usage_statusreturned quota status foranon:mcp-default.
This proves the MCP server works locally, but it does not prove Glama Analytics increments for those local calls.
Use:
MisakaNet is already registered as an MCP server and local MCP usage works. The current Glama issue is not MCP functionality — it is an analytics / gateway counting boundary.
Avoid:
MisakaNet has 0 usage. MCP integration needs to be fixed. We need to register as an MCP server.
- Ask Glama or check Glama maintainer docs for whether a hosted/gateway endpoint can be enabled for this listing.
- If a hosted/gateway endpoint appears, run one
tools/callthrough that endpoint and re-check analytics after 10-30 minutes. - Keep first-call conversion work focused on copy-paste setup until a hosted Glama path is confirmed.